Q&A: Everything you want to know about the recent ruling on recognition of same-sex marriages in the EU

Here is a concise overview of what the new Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) ruling means for same sex couples moving or living across the EU.

1. What the ruling does

  • What is this ruling about?
    The Court of Justice of the European Union issued a landmark judgement in the case Jakub Cupriak-Trojan and Mateusz Trojan v Wojewoda Mazowiecki (C-713/23), requiring all EU Member States to recognise same sex marriages performed in other EU countries so that EU free movement rights are guaranteed. When a couple is legally married in one EU Member State, their marital status must be acknowledged when they move to or reside in another. Otherwise, the Court said that it is a discrimination based on sexual orientation.

  • Does this mean same sex marriage is now legal everywhere in the EU?
    Not exactly. The judgment does not force any country to introduce marriage equality at home, and this is expressly mentioned in the judgment. It only requires every EU Member State to recognise a same sex marriage that was legally performed in another EU country. This means your marriage must be acknowledged when you move across borders.

  • Are all Member States affected, including those that do not allow same sex marriage?
    Yes. Countries whose national laws do not allow same sex marriage must still recognise marriages performed elsewhere in the EU to ensure EU free movement rights and the fundamental right to private and family life are guaranteed. This recognition must grant the rights that accompany marital status, such as residency rights, social benefits, inheritance, next of kin status and others. 

  • Does the ruling require countries to change their national marriage laws?
    No. The judgment does not oblige any Member State to introduce marriage equality. However, it requires them to create a non-discriminatory and workable administrative procedure to recognise same sex marriages performed in other EU countries, if they don’t have one already.

  • What rights must Member States grant when recognising a same sex marriage?
    Recognition must be effective and meaningful. This may include, depending on the rights marriage grants in the specific countries:
    • Residence and family reunification rights
    • Social security coordination
    • Access to public services
    • Inheritance and tax rights
    • Next of kin status in healthcare and emergencies
    • Rights connected to names and documentation
    • Rights connected to parenthood, such as adoption or access to as adoption or access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART)

Member States cannot offer a limited or symbolic form of recognition that leaves couples without granting substantive rights attached to marriage.

  • Can a Member State use a different procedure instead of transcribing the marriage certificate?
    Yes. The ruling allows flexibility in procedures, such as transcription, registration or an equivalent mechanism, as long as the process is not discriminatory or burdensome and ensures full recognition of the marriage. A state cannot create obstacles that delay, discourage or deny recognition. In the case of Poland, the Court considered that the transcription of marriage certificates in the civil register is the only way for marriage to be recognised in that country.

2. Who is covered

  • I got married in a non-EU country. Can I transcribe my marriage in all EU countries?
    The judgment applies only to EU citizens who lawfully concluded a marriage in an EU Member State in which they exercised their freedom to move and reside. If your marriage was concluded outside the EU, you cannot rely on this judgment to require transcription in a Member State where same sex marriage is not legal.

  • I live in the EU but I am not an EU citizen. I got married to an EU citizen. Can our marriage be transcribed in other EU countries?
    This depends on each national system, but the specific judgment applies to marriages concluded by EU citizens in an EU Member State where they exercised their free movement rights. It does not directly regulate marriages involving a non-EU spouse who did not exercise free movement.

  • I live in the EU but I am not an EU citizen. I got married to another non-EU citizen. Can our marriage be transcribed in other EU countries?
    This falls outside the scope of the judgment. The ruling focuses on marriages concluded in an EU Member State by people who exercised their freedom to move and reside under EU law. However, in the Coman judgement against Romania, the CJEU decided that EU Member States have an obligation to grant the spouse (including from a country outside the EU) of an EU citizen a residence permit in the same way they would grant permits to different-sex couples. Although Romania has yet to implement this judgment, all couples in the same situation across the EU can rely on it.

  • My country does not recognise same sex marriage but offers civil unions. Would this ruling force countries like Italy to transcribe a marriage performed in another EU country?
    Yes, for free movement purposes. A country must recognise the marital status of a same sex couple legally married in another EU Member State and grant the rights linked to that status, even if it offers only civil unions at national level.

3. Practical recognition and procedures

  • What should couples do to get their marriage recognised in another EU country?
    Recognition works differently across EU Member States, and the process can feel confusing. Local LGBTI organisations and equality bodies can guide you through the steps in your country and help you understand what you may need to prepare.
  • What if authorities refuse to recognise our marriage?
    You still have rights. If a country refuses recognition:
    • Ask for the refusal in writing.
    • Seek support from equality bodies or LGBTI organisations.
    • With the help of local organisations or lawyers, the CJEU ruling will allow you to challenge that refusal through the national procedures.

EU law requires all Member States to comply with the judgment.

4. Families and children

  • What does the ruling mean for families with children?
    The main focus is marital status, but recognising parents as married can have downstream effects on:
    • Recognition of parental responsibility
    • Access to family benefits
    • Administrative procedures related to children

The ruling builds on previous EU case law that requires recognition of parent-child relationships established in another Member State.

5. Country landscape

  • Which EU countries do not have marriage equality?
    Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia.

  • Which countries do not legally recognise same sex partnerships?
    Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Lithuania and Poland.

  • Which countries will experience the biggest changes because of this ruling?
    Countries that do not allow same sex marriage or have limited recognition for rainbow families will need to adjust the most. The ruling increases pressure on governments that have stalled or resisted legal recognition.

6. Wider legal and political implications

  • How does this ruling fit within broader EU case law?
    The judgment builds on earlier decisions stating that:
    • The term spouse under free movement law includes same sex spouses
    • Parent-child relationships established in one Member State must be recognised by others
    • Legal gender recognition obtained in one Member State must be recognised by others
    • Non-discrimination is a core EU principle

It confirms a trend toward consistent cross-border protection of LGBTI persons and their families.

It also confirms that the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation enshrined in the Charter is a general principle of EU law that is mandatory and confers enforceable rights on individuals. 

  • What does this mean for future LGBTI rights in Europe?
    This ruling is a major step forward for unified family recognition in the EU. While it does not mandate marriage equality, it:
    • Strengthens the legal protection of same sex couples
    • Prevents governments from denying recognition
    • May encourage national reforms and future EU initiatives
    • Provides clarity and security for families who move, work and live across borders
  • Why is this ruling important for LGBTI rights in Europe?
    It protects LGBTI families who move across borders, prevents Member States from denying valid marriages, reinforces EU non-discrimination obligations and continues a clear line of case law supporting the rights of LGBTI people.

  • Where can people get help or more information?
    ILGA-Europe will continue providing updates, legal resources and guidance for affected couples and communities. National LGBTI organisations, legal clinics and equality bodies can also assist. ILGA Europe’s member organisations can be found on our website.

Source

Photo: European Union, 2020

See also

News

Romanian court victory confirms recognition of trans identities across the EU

Romanian court confirms obligation to recognise gender identity registered in another EU member state, following landmark Court of Justice of the European Union ruling. Today, […]
read more
News

Poland: Supreme Administrative Court confirms EU law obligation to recognise same-sex marriages concluded abroad

On 20 March 2026, Poland’s Supreme Administrative Court issued a landmark ruling implementing an earlier CJEU judgment and confirming that the refusal to transcribe same-sex […]
read more
News

Landmark CJEU ruling demands Member States to ensure legal gender recognition to guarantee freedom of movement

Today’s judgment by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) says all member states must provide for legal gender recognition procedures allowing their citizens […]
read more
News

Proposed new Civil Code will distance Ukraine from EU Accession

A critical legal development posing a significant threat to the rights and legal security of LGBTI people will jeopardise Ukraine’s chances of EU membership. Brussels, […]
read more
Podcast

The Frontline: Lessons in people power – The Irish Marriage Referendum, 10 years on

Ten years after Ireland’s landmark marriage equality referendum, this episode of The Frontline offers a powerful and insight rich talk for LGBTI activists, community organisers […]
read more
Press Release

PRESS RELEASE: the pressure facing Pride organisers in Hungary

Brussels briefing sheds new light on the pressure facing Pride organisers in Hungary and the stakes for the European Union At a media briefing in […]
read more
News

We welcome the EU’s Top Court landmark judgment: Member States Must Recognise Same-Sex Marriages from Other EU Countries

The EU Court of Justice has ruled that it is unlawful for Poland to refuse to recognise a same-sex marriage concluded by two Polish citizens […]
read more
Press Release

From Courtrooms to Parliament: Lithuania Faces a Defining Moment for Family Equality

Lithuania is entering a decisive phase in the recognition and protection of diverse families. Following landmark judicial rulings, civil partnership is now firmly on the […]
read more
News

Joint Statement: Landmark CJEU opinion demands legal gender recognition across EU

A new opinion from Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union says all member states must recognise the lived gender of […]
read more
News

French Court orders end to mandatory gender titles on train tickets

The ruling follows a CJEU judgment and marks a major step for data protection and gender inclusivity in the EU. France’s Supreme Administrative Court (Conseil […]
read more
News

Joint statement welcoming European court’s ruling against Poland over anti-gay hate crime

The European Court of Human Rights has issued a judgement against Poland for failing to properly investigate and prosecute a homophobic attack against a gay […]
read more
NewsPress Release

Semenya v. Switzerland: Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights Judgment

Joint press release of the third-party interveners Today, 10 July 2025, in a pivotal judgment, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights […]
read more
News

Open letter to EU: Safeguarding Civil Society

A coalition of civil society organisations sent a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Commissioner Piotr Serafin expressing concerns about restrictive […]
read more
News

Budapest Pride Could Have Been Legal and Safe. The European Commission Chose Otherwise.

By refusing to act, the European Commission enabled the ban and left activists alone to defend fundamental rights. A joint declaration by ILGA-Europe, Forbidden Colours, […]
read more
Blog

Against the odds: progress for LGBTI rights in Europe

While setbacks for LgbtI rights have dominated the headlines from this year’s Rainbow Map, a quieter story of resilience and progress is unfolding. In the […]
read more
Press Release

European Court rules Czech Republic violated trans rights with forced sterilisation

In a pivotal judgment delivered today, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has found that the Czech Republic violates the rights of trans people […]
read more
Press Release

Pride Ban Must Not Go Ahead as EU Advocate General Confirms Hungary’s ‘Child Protection Law’ Breaches EU Law

In a major development, Advocate General of Europe’s top court has issued an opinion considering Hungary’s anti-LGBTI legislation to be in breach of EU law, […]
read more
News

What the CJEU AG’s Opinion in the infringement case against Hungary means for LGBTI equality in the EU

The CJEU Advocate General has just delivered her Opinion in the Commission v Hungary “EU values” infringement case (C-769/22) – a major CJEU case on […]
read more
News

Joint Statement: CJEU to rule on landmark case regarding ban on legal gender recognition in Bulgaria

The European Court of Justice has held a pivotal hearing in the Shipov case, challenging Bulgaria’s de facto ban on legal gender recognition and whether […]
read more
Blog

The real life consequences of the EU’s equality u-turn

Seventeen years ago, the EU promised to protect people from discrimination in everyday life, not just at work. Now, that promise is being rolled back. […]
read more
News

UN and EU condemn growing crackdown on LGBTI rights and human rights defenders in Belarus.

The United Nations has condemned increasing violence, discrimination, and hate speech targeting LGBTI people in Belarus, while the European Union has raised the alarm over […]
read more
Blog

Why the threat to scrap a long-delayed EU Directive threatens LGBTI Roma rights

As the EU considers cancelling a crucial anti-discrimination measure, LGBTI Roma are vulnerable to even greater marginalisation. On International Roma Day, we’re mobilising people power […]
read more
News

CJEU Advocate General: Member States Must Recognise Same-Sex Marriages from Other EU Countries

An opinion from the EU Court of Justice’s Advocate General states that Member States must recognise same-sex marriages performed in other EU countries to ensure […]
read more
Report

Inventory of relevant SOGIESC case law and pending cases before the ECtHR and CJEU 2025

In order to focus our strategic litigation efforts across Europe to fully protect and advance LGBTI rights, with this inventory ILGA-Europe wants to support members […]
read more
News

Joint statement welcoming EU’s top court judgment to correct a trans man’s gender identity data in national registry

Today, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) issued a judgment in the case of Deldits (C-247/23), stating that national authorities responsible for keeping public registers […]
read more
News

European court rules teacher’s dismissal over gay blog violated free speech

The European Court of Human Rights rendered a judgement in a case where the Polish authorities fired a school teacher for writing on a blog […]
read more
News

Joint statement welcoming judgement on Russia’s failure to protect the privacy of personal data

ILGA-Europe and the AIRE Centre welcome the judgement from the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Bazhenov and others v. Russia Last […]
read more
Report

Our submission to the EC 2025 Rule of Law report

After a year of elections across the EU, threats to democracy and the rule of law are growing both in Europe and globally. Our submission […]
read more
News

Joint statement welcoming CJEU judgment to halt unlawful gender title collection

The EU Court of Justice has judged that it is unlawful for France’s national railway company to force passengers to choose between ‘Mr’ and ‘Ms’ […]
read more
News

Joint statement on today’s long-awaited judgment from the European Court of Human Rights on violations of LGBTI human rights in Armenia

ILGA-Europe and TGEU celebrate the judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Minasyan and Others v. Armenia, upholding the rights […]
read more